Mejorando la eficiencia de estudio teórico en estudiantes de medicina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59706/aebmedicine.v2i1.10459Keywords:
recuerdo activo, repetición espaciada, educación médica, retroalimentación, estudioAbstract
Antecedentes: La retención de conocimientos es crucial para la práctica médica efectiva, pero los métodos tradicionales como la relectura son ineficientes y poco sostenibles a largo plazo. Existe una brecha en la investigación sobre métodos de estudio más eficientes que pueden mejorar la retención y el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de medicina. Objetivo: Este estudio se plantea explorar y evaluar la efectividad de técnicas de estudio avanzadas, como la recuperación activa y la repetición espaciada, utilizando herramientas como Anki. Material y métodos: En esta revisión narrativa se analizaron diversas fuentes que abordan técnicas de estudio y su efectividad en la retención de conocimientos y el rendimiento académico. Resultados: A través de esta revisión se identificaron dichas técnicas como significativamente superiores en comparación con métodos pasivos. Los hallazgos demuestran que Anki, que emplea recuperación activa y repetición espaciada, mejora notablemente la retención de información y el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de medicina. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos de esta revisión contribuyen al campo de la educación médica al proporcionar evidencia sobre métodos de estudio más eficaces, sugiriendo una necesidad de adopción generalizada y futura investigación sobre su implementación en facultades de medicina de México.
Downloads
References
Krathwohl DR. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Vol. 41, Theory into Practice. Ohio State University Press; 2002. p. 212–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Custers EJFM. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: A review study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. enero de 2010;15(1):109–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y
Cuddy MM, Young A, Gelman A, Swanson DB, Johnson DA, Dillon GF, et al. Exploring the Relationships Between USMLE Performance and Disciplinary Action in Practice: A Validity Study of Score Inferences From a Licensure Examination. Academic Medicine. diciembre de 2017;92(12):1780–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001747
Karpicke JD, Butler AC, Roediger HL. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory. 2009;17(4):471–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
Kuhbandner C, Emmerdinger KJ. Do students really prefer repeated rereading over testing when studying textbooks? A reexamination. Memory. el 9 de agosto de 2019;27(7):952–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1610177
Mark Carrier L. COLLEGE STUDENTS’ CHOICES OF STUDY STRATEGIES " ’ [Internet]. Vol. 96. 2003. Disponible en: http://www.csudh.edu/oir/index2.htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.96.1.54-56
Callender AA, McDaniel MA. The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemp Educ Psychol. enero de 2009;34(1):30–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.001
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Vol. 14, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013. p. 4–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Fletcherand~harles CR, Bloom P. Causal Reasoning in the Comprehension of Simple Narrative Texts. Vol. 21, JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE. 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90052-6
Healy AF, Bourne LE, Training E. Cognition Optimizing Efficiency, Durability, and Generalizability.
Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. el 10 de junio de 2014;111(23):8410–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Michael J. How We Learn Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2006;30:159–67. Disponible en: www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Minhas PS, Ghosh A, Swanzy L. The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course. Anat Sci Educ. julio de 2012;5(4):200–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1274
Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Vol. 93, Journal of Engineering Education. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2004. p. 223–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA. Cooperative Learning Returns To College: What Evidence Is There That It Works?
Markant DB, Ruggeri A, Gureckis TM, Xu F. Enhanced Memory as a Common Effect of Active Learning. Vol. 10, Mind, Brain, and Education. Blackwell Publishing; 2016. p. 142–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12117
Hart-Matyas M, Taylor A, Lee HJ, Maclean MA, Hui A, Macleod A. Twelve tips for medical students to establish a col-laborative flashcard project. Med Teach. el 4 de mayo de 2019;41(5):505–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1426843
Ebbinghaus H. Concerning memory, 1885. En: Readings in the history of psychology. East Norwalk: Apple-ton-Century-Crofts; 1948. p. 304–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11304-034
Khalafi A, Fallah Z, Sharif-Nia H. The effect of spaced learning on the learning outcome and retention of nurse anesthesia students: a randomized-controlled study. BMC Med Educ. el 1 de diciembre de 2024;24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05290-9
Jape D, Zhou J, Bullock S. A spaced-repetition approach to enhance medical student learning and engagement in medical pharmacology. BMC Med Educ. el 1 de diciembre de 2022;22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03324-8
Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull. mayo de 2006;132(3):354–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Zamora-Huaringa EG. Active recall y spaced repetition: herramientas para estudiantes de Medicina. Educación Médica. julio de 2024;25(4):100919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100919
Heredia-Cabrera GC, García-Herrera DG, Álvarez-Lozano MI. Flash cards: Una estrategia didáctica para el aprendizaje signi-ficativo en estudiantes universitarios. CIENCIAMATRIA. el 15 de agosto de 2022;8(4):307–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v8i4.854
Novak JD. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations Invited Papers. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society. 2010;6(3):21–30.
Lachner A, Nückles M. Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts’ explanations enhance novices’ deep-learning. J Exp Psychol Appl. el 1 de marzo de 2015;21(1):101–15.
Roediger HL, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Vol. 15, Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2011. p. 20–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
Fiorella L, Mayer RE. The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemp Educ Psychol. octubre de 2013;38(4):281–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001
Lachner A, Nückles M. Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts’ explanations enhance novices’ deep-learning. J Exp Psychol Appl. el 1 de marzo de 2015;21(1):101–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000038
S/A. Anki: User Manual. https://docs.ankiweb.net/getting-started.html. 2016.
Levy J, Ely K, Lagasca G, Kausar H, Patel D, Andersen S, et al. Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. enero de 2023;10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231205389
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eric Sánchez-Olivan, Andrea Aurora Munive-Gutiérrez, Moisés Martínez-Hernández
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license.
